Thursday, 29 July 2010

At the cinema, on the internet


I feel compelled to write about inception, I can't not write about it. It is all anyone is talking about and it deserves that amount of attention. I saw it the other day and it had a great impression on me as it affected others. I was amazed because the themes of the film are so abstract yet that obscurity is not an obstacle for the "blockbuster" elements of the movie, it is perfectly accessible. Nolan does this by restraining the narrative: dealing with dreams and dream theory can get out of hand easily and dream theory itself is massive and complex but everything in the film is simplified and exposed. There are dreams within dreams within dreams and there is dream manipulation and relativity of time but the spectator is never lost. Also, the film doesn't focus on doubting reality either, there are key moments where reality is put into question but for the most part reality is clearly defined and the skepticism is not the central theme. The action within the movie was never gratuitous or redundant it seemed vital to the story, to the characters. However even without the action scenes, the film would have still been great due to the depth of the story. DiCaprio seems to be drawn to psychologically tormented characters in denial but hey it's working pretty well, the Departed, The Aviator, Shutter Island were all great films. Joseph Gordon Levitt stole the show with two of the best fight scenes ever. Inception is Christopher Nolan's first time writing by himself(he normally writes with his brother) and it shows in some parts where the dialogue is a little too heavy on exposition and the last scene was superfluous and a bit cheap but overall he has composed an airtight, brooding blockbuster.


The Social Network
I found the trailer for this little prospect today on a blog. The social network is David Fincher's biopic of Mark Zuckerburg and the creation of facebook. It looks surprisingly interesting but at the same time it seems weird to make a film out of it. Facebook is a very interesting subject from which many themes can be approached but the film seems to be more concerned with dramatizing Zuckerberg's ordeal. Also, the attempt at revamping creep(which everyone is sick of) works for the trailer and the whole idea of Facebook. I would like to see how Jesse Eisenberg approaches the role because I've never really found him funny yet he does have a certain charm like geek appeal(not unlike Michael Cera)





The Green Hornet

I've been looking forward to this trailer for a while just to see what Seth Rogen in a superhero movie would look like and it looks boring. I am intrigued that they have chosen to use a comic tone but then again it would be hard to go straight faced drama with Rogen although I think he could do it. Michel Gondry was the other reason I was excited about his movie. He represents the eccentric, do it yourself, creative type of filmmaking but the style of the movie looks very bland and generic. I will definitely see it but my expectations have been lowered greatly.



Yay for Christoph Waltz!

Thursday, 8 July 2010

Flying with the sun

I just discovered that a company called Solar Impulse is experimenting with their planes by relying solely on solar energy and I'm deeply intrigued. Although their site doesn't concentrate on how the plane actually works it is a very exciting prospect. The first flight landed this morning after 26 hours of flight, the prototype is composed of 12000 photovoltaic(energy conversion) cells that are relayed onto 4 big electric motors.



This of course got the science fiction geek inside of me ecstatic and giddy. Admittedly everything is still in the experimental stage, but it's reassuring to know people are still endeavouring to break through and change the way we think about energy and new ideas. To think that in my lifetime, I might fly on Ryanair and it would be solar powered gives hope for the future. However, Solar impulse don't have the resources to take the project to that stage and the commercial plane would be hard to build (huge wingspan, tiny hull). I believe they are completing the vital foundation that could open up to commercial airlines.

When it comes to solar energy as a solution to the depletion of fossil fuels people tend to be very skeptical and I'm no different. The question is: is solar energy reliable? is it sustainable enough for a trans atlantic flight?
This bold project is starting to cast my doubts away. Plus, in a few days they will test the plane at night to evaluate its charging capacities.


Tuesday, 6 July 2010

Paris Film Festival: First Three days



This is my second year at this particular festival and I have to say it has expanded quite a bit since I last experienced it. Still at the huge MK2 Bibliotheques cinema, the festival has become more popular which has lead to more movies being available. Every year the festival highlights one country and it's cinematic exports, this year Japan will be in the spotlight. So on the first day I enjoyed some of Japan's best films, it is a very ecelectic selection and each film is preceeded by an introduction given by a specialist.

5 things I learned about Japan thanks to the Paris Film Festival:
1 If you kill a japanese person either accidentally or on purpose expect a swift and horrible revenge to come down on you.In "Pure Asia", a young girl is murdered by thugs on the street so her sister decides to go on a terrorist rampage on all those who let it happen. She tosses mustard gas into assembly halls and train stations.
In "Machine Girl", a young boy is murdered so his sister starts her vendetta by attaching a chain gun to her wrist and murders everyone involved. It seems that there is no police or judiciary system, people just sort it out themselves, which sounds badass until you cross Machine girl's path. So don't mess with japanese people, for the love of christ.
I will add more details of my education as the festival continues.

The competition itself is comprised of 8 films picked out 1500 films. After watching two, I couldn't help but be disappointed though. One was a Romanian prison movies which tackled some interesting subject on morality but it was lacking narrative direction, the whole movie happens in the last twenty minutes. It was still really good but it made me wonder about the quality of the other 1499 films So I hope the competition develops into something better, something really eye catching over the next few days.



5 reasons why the Paris Film Festival is more fun than Cannes:
1 You don't have to wade through a sea of cameramen, journalists and elbows to see a movie
2 Furthermore, anyone can enjoy the Premieres for a modest price. You don't have to be privileged to enter the actual cinema.
3 It's in Paris
4 There's a movie for everyone. The festival hosts a huge array of different films.
5 The Paris Festival will close with a huge Cinekaroake session. I still don't really know what that is but it sounds fun.

More to come...

Saturday, 26 June 2010

Sexy International Paris Film Festival 2010:Day two

My second day at the festival, and today I watched some Australian films and then I got my first look at the films in the competition. The first day had a lot of feminist themes and topics with the acting troupe reading out feminist manifestos and the screening of porn films made by women for women. But today was much more eclectic, there were films about male dominance, female desire, privacy e.t.c

I arrived at the Grande Action cinema at three and got a seat to watch some sexy, Australian films. It was a very intriguing mix but there were some that were definitely pretentious. There were some comedic ones which was refreshing, the festival has been lacking in comedy movies. There were a lot of short, absurdist ones which were interesting too like "Chick addict" by Victoria Waghorn. I was also informed of how strict the rules regarding sex in cinema were in Australia, films like Romeo and Juliet directed by Franco Zeffirelli were banned. In recent years The Australian cinema board has loosened the rules which has subsequently allowed these filmmakers to make their films.

I had a half an hour break between screening so I decided to wander around the neighborhood, when I heard the mass of people celebrating the gay pride parade. I've never seen so many people on the streets of Paris and there were no riot police or CRS. It was crazy, everyone was out on the streets.

I went back to the cinema after the bedlam to see the standard of the films in the competition.
I was rather disappointed by some of the entries, half of the films were poor attempts at humor and completely uninteresting. There were two that grabbed my attention. "Ona", directed by Pau Camarasa, displayed beautiful, thought provoking cinematography and brooding narrative.


"Bobby visits the Library", directed by Eric Krasner also caught my eye. Krasner, edited together two "educational" films together to make an interesting perspective on American culture. One film was about a young boy enjoying the services of his local children's library, the other was a fear monger film, warning people to be aware of libraries and their sexually deviant material.

I saw a lot of movies, most of which were thought provoking which really shows how versatile and deep this festival is, I would definitely consider it a succesful debut.

Sexy International Paris Film Festival 2010: First Impressions


After wandering through the town hall and finally finding the sexy international Paris Film festival, I am given my press pass in a small yet hospitable room. As I look around I see about 15 people, a long table with some cheap snacks and punch. There are directors, actors, producers and journalists. Much smaller than film festivals I'm used to, the SIPFF is as intimate as its central theme. It's humble size allows for much more mingling, journalist can approach directors and producers, photographers can capture a lot more.

The festival itself was ambiguous: what exactly is it about? Admittedly, I did very little research plus there wasn't a lot of information on the site so I had to just go and find out. After reading all their pamphlets and press kits, I began to understand that they wanted to tackle a bit of everything, there is a section on porn, there is eroticism in cinema, romance in society and so on.


Can you take your mum to the Sexy International Paris Film Festival?

Approaching the SIPFF, it's uncertain just how far they go regarding eroticism and sexuality. So it is reasonable to think that it could be interesting to go with a parent, I mean you're both adults why not? The first day of screenings starts off with several eclectic short films, that deal with desire, loneliness and separation. The ensemble, is quite soft. There are a few sex scenes but they are tastefully cinematic. There was a short break before the second screening which concerned a series of porn films made by women for women. Now this is were the festival goes up a gear as far as intimacy goes. The first film presented an exchange of roles. A couple gets bored of normal sex, so the women decides to dress like a man and vice versa and then they have sex with the roles reversed. All four films were very interesting because they displayed a female perspective, they didn't seem pornographic in the traditional sense, they seemed to convey pure desire. So the first day of screenings proved very interesting and informed me about just how explicit the content would be. Now, onto day two.

Thursday, 10 June 2010

I started listening to rap or hip hop earnestly when I was seventeen. But I couldn’t explain this sudden change in opinion. Before, I would reject any and every rapper and song. I was a devout listener of rock music. There were a number of things that distressed me about the rap genre. Firstly, I couldn’t get over the contradictory nature of it, rappers would rap about themselves in misogynistic, egotistical verses on one song and then rap about the importance of family, community and equality on the next song in the same album. On Nas’ 2002 release “God Son”, he glorifies drug lords like Nicky Barnes on the song “Get down”, then later on in the album, there is the song “I can”, where Nas tries to inspire children to be “An architect, doctor, maybe an actress” and not to use “heroin, cocaine, sniffin up drugs all in her nose... “ . It seems like they are just trying to pander to every one like a marketing ploy developed by their record companies. Then, there is the infamous use of the word nigger, which has become ubiquitous in the genre, dating to about the creation of N.W.A.. So did I just abandon my ideals and submit to the popular genre like a sell out or had I been convinced by something else? Is there more to this genre than money?


One thing that I’ve realized I enjoy about rap music is its poetic nature, which is something a lot of people seem to neglect when talking about the genre. It seems obvious once you become aware of the poetic instruments used. Rappers use rhyming schemes (obviously), tone, rhythm patterns (or flow), imagery. Beyond this, the majority of rap music abandons strict, linear narratives or songs that carry one unified message. Instead, rappers choose to voice opinions, feelings and depict situations of poverty (in the projects) or of wealth (in the heights), which is obviously inspired by the desire to express oneself as in Lyric poetry. The genre embraces digression; the rapper tries to touch on several topics in the same verse, a lot of the time without correlation between the topics. For example, in Kanye West’s “Two Words”, it seems quite obscure what point Mos def is trying to make:

Two words, United States, no love, no brakes
Low brow, high stakes, crack smoke, black folks
Big Macs, fat folks, ecstasy capsules
Presidential scandals, everybody MOVE
Two words, Mos Def, K West, hot shit
Calm down, get back, ghetto people, got this
Game ball, lock shit, dump off, cock shit
We won't stop shit, everybody MOVE
Kanye West, “Two Words”)



However, this neglect of “structure” does not stem from ignorance rather it is part of a want for feeling. It’s as if he is impatiently trying to voice a million ideas, it invokes feeling and creates vast diorama detailed intricately.
Moreover, a rapper is only as good as his ability to freestyle, thus the rapper creates a poetic flow that is improvised and inspired by the moment much like the works of surrealist poets like Andre Breton with the cadavre exquis. This poetic influence might be linked to African American culture that stems from a long history of Oral tradition, history and narratives passed down through spoken word.

Returning to the word nigger because one cannot avoid it when debating about Rap music. It can be difficult to understand what rappers wish to achieve by using it relentlessly. I felt, like many others, ambivalent to the word being thrown around, considering the connotations relating to the slavery era, at times it seems rather disrespectful and insensitive towards those who suffered, those who were bound by chains and the word nigger. However, the word was being used in African-American culture as far back as the 1970’s before the conception of hip hop in the late seventies to early eighties. Richard Prior used it controversially in his stand up. The word is used between African Americans:

“In many African-American neighborhoods, nigga is simply the most common term used to refer to any male, of any race or ethnicity. Increasingly, the term has been applied to any person, male or female.”
(Arthur K. Spears, Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 2006)

Therefore there is a confusion of cause and effect between society and art. Some critics (Get a name, scholar or columnist) argue that rappers use it to reverse its effect. By using it incessantly they have, in a way, defused its original connotation and turned it into an instrument to inspire solidarity in African Americans. In spite of this reminder of the wonder of language there is still a problem: now there are two meanings to it and
therefore it has become dubious and double edged.

“For instance, a show on Black Entertainment Television, a cable network aimed at a black audience, described the word nigger as a “term of endearment.” “In the African American community, the word nigga (not nigger) brings out feelings of pride” (Davis)

Yet, there are numerous instances where people of other races use the word off the cuff and have been black listed by the African American community (Michael Richards, Ron Atkinson are some infamous examples). The word nigger continues to be a dangerous and ambivalent word but the dichotomy between the rapper’s (and African American culture in general) use of the word and the historical use emphasizes the complexity and importance of language as a means of communication and representation. Just as verbs when used excessively and in different situations become irregular, nouns like nigger can become “irregular”.


Rap music is heavily based on image and building a persona. In order to be recognized, the majority of rappers develop a reputation as a gangsta or pimp or coke dealer. Their reputation can have some truth to it like Jay-z who did actually sell drugs or it can be completely fabricated like Ice cube during his career with N.W.A or Clipse. This is done through lyrics first and foremost; you need to speak the language, you need to recite anecdotes about your past et cetera. But a rapper can’t leave his persona solely on the record; he needs to maintain it as well as he can throughout his personal life. Nowadays the genre is a battle of egos, you’re either allies or enemies, either you feature regularly on your buddy’s record or there’s a beef. The unusual thing is how easily this can change depending on what a particular rapper wants at that time. The best example is the game, who after teaming up with G-unit after his first album is now adamantly antagonistic with the Brooklyn outfit. This demonstrates the theatricality of the genre. It can demand a lot of tailoring your awn image and trying to destroy your opponent’s credibility Rappers seem to need a certain amount of street cred if their rags to riches narratives are going to be taken seriously. You might need to have spent some time in prison, have been shot, have sold drugs or just had a lamentable childhood. However entertaining this theatre rap might be, it is important to consider the effect this can have on the culture. In certain mentalities, rappers are the representatives of the African-American population and black people in general. Thus, there are horrible stereotypes cast over a whole group. Now, I’m not saying I agree with the rapper’s view on the world, I’m simply trying to expose the dichotomy between the rapper himself and his persona. Of course, this can be related to the age old idea of celebrity in general, and the creation of an alternate persona exists in other genres (Bowie, Dylan et cetera) but rap seems to be more dependent on this image.


However, there are several rappers who transcend the need to create a rebel character like a tribe called quest, fat lip and the Pharcyde. They rap as themselves, transparent and because of this they are labeled “intellectual” or unusual when in reality they are closer to the initial values of hip hop as a form of expression. They deal with social problems directly from a wider perspective. Fat lip turns the arrogant, self loving character on its head in “What up Fat Lip?”: “Over the years it seems I’m getting dumber […] Yeah, I’m a brotha but sometimes I don’t feel black”. He exposes an interesting issue, what does it mean to feel black? What are the expectations? Obviously, I can’t delve into self conscious, aimed at socio-political rap without mentioning Public enemy. The duo explicitly confronted the issues that affected the African American community with great determination. Whereas most rappers, especially in the contemporary list, tend to rap about poverty and social conflict solely in relation to themselves, or they rap about it but simply as a ploy to appear concerned (Akon “Ghetto”). Chuck D and Flava Flav investigated the their culture amidst the melting pot of America (“It takes a nation of millions to hold us back”, “Fear of a Black Planet”), the discrimination against African Americans from the entertainment industry (“Burn Hollywood Burn”) and they wrote songs that incited African Americans to be more politically aware and active (“Fight the power”).
So what happened to people like Chuck D? Did he strive in vain or are all the problems solved now? Well, even though chuck d has stopped rapping and there has been some considerable social progress in America there are still people who continue to be informants, describing the inequalities that persist but also celebrating the challenges that have been overcome. Some examples would be Q-tip, Panacea, Talib Kwali and even Kanye West to some extent. But the most vehement rappers trying to articulate their idea’s on politics (Dead prez) suffer from having their voices drowned out by the mainstream rap

The genre has changed in some ways. Beginning with the method, listening to sugarhill gang and run DMC and comparing it to Aesop Rock or Lil Wayne it is easy to see there is an important change in the lyrics themselves and rhyming. “Rapper’s delight” can seem a bit innocent and simple:
“i said a hip hop the hippie the hippie
to the hip hip hop, a you dont stop
the rock it to the bang bang boogie say up jumped the boogie
to the rhythm of the boogie, the beat”
Contemporary rap seems profane and extravagant in comparison. A lot of rap lyrics are provocative and crudely explicit. The there are artists like Aesop rock who use abstract and complex lyrics and rhyming patterns, who demonstrate a more direct influence to poetry, focusing on tempo and the sounds of words.

”pirouetting madly on a mirror full of baggies in the valley of the irritable aggie, any sincerity, miracles,or memory buried in the back-seat by the hazardous material was seriously gasping,here he is in action trying to patch up the attraction, figured he would win her back if he act in a common passion”
(Aesop Rock “Fumes”),

Aesop rock's lyrics are abstract and adhere to poetic methods like. rhythmic stream

See I wanna fuck, tell me whats up
Walk around the club with yo thumb in ya mouth
Put my dick in, take your thumb out[…]
I keep a hoe hot when I'm puttin' in work
Wanna skeet skeet you bout to get your feelin's hurt”
(Ying Yang twins,”Wait”)


Another objection commonly raised against rap music is its originality. The genre is continuously criticized for being dependant on sampling music (taking it from other sources and incorporating it into their songs). There is more to sampling than just theft, it is a creative process. Sure, there are rappers who merely hear a beat or a melody and exploit it. Tinchy Stryder’s “Tiny Dancer” is a good example as it takes advantage of the appeal and notoriety of Elton John and Bernie Taupin’s 1971 classic. Stryder’s version depends on the melody sung in the chorus and the whole song builds up to that moment, whereas the rest of the song is bland. A talented sampler will go beyond mere pick and mix, they will adapt the music and create a synergy between the original music and the sample. A tribe called quest’s “Can I kick it?” is renowned by peers as being a great sample. They use the bassline from Lou Reed’s “walk on the wild side”, but they use it in a way that makes it their own. Instead of the bass being the rhythm for the subdued tranquility of Reed’s song, it is backed by a resounding beat transporting it and integrating it into the vision of A tribe called quest. Furthermore, hip hop is not the only domain where sampling takes place and people seem to forget that: sculpture, poetry, the novel, painting and theatre just to name a few. Shakepeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” has been adapted and sampled incessantly for hundreds of years but that doesn’t stop anyone from picking up the play and presenting their personal interpretation and representation.


The genre has changed. Rappers have changed and the genre reaches a much bigger audience. Rap marks an important breach of American music culture, a rise in black artists in a predominately white domain, so where jazz and blues was labeled as “Negro music” and cast out to Europe, Rap is arguably an American genre.But as any part of the entertainment industry, rap music is fueled by the pursuit of wealth and fame. It is simply inherent, and to refuse to abide by the popular conventions, artists like A tribe called Quest, Panacea, Fat lip et cetera sacrifice the opportunity to become mega famous and mega rich. . The genre evolves, but one must ask; Is it a good evolution? Does the fact that it’s more popular correlate to a commercialization of the music? As Jay-z once said “I’m not a businessman, I am a business, man.”Even if I have failed to convince you of hip hop’s merit, I have attempted to demonstrate the complexity and depth that this genre comprehends, engulfing so many different sounds and narratives. I have begun to unpack the important connections this music has in society, not just America, but everywhere. The utility the genre has to voice the opinions of minorities and how it can be misused and manipulated and how the genre went from being this voice of a minority to becoming one of the most popular genres to date, listened by everyone, created by people of different social backgrounds.

Tuesday, 8 June 2010

World cup: The Movie

As the world cup approaches, everyone gets excited: flags are being hung up everywhere and the faces of Ribery and Gourcuff are pasted everywhere. I think about all the great movies that glorify the huge event and the sport and realize there are none. Commonly referred to as the most popular sport in the world(omitting the US), football is an integral part of culture: it is broadcasted on tv constantly, players are paid CEO salaries and no one can avoid watching the world cup, it is inescapable. Then why hasn't there been a good football movie? The film "Goal" came close depicting the rise of a young star but it was more about fame then anything else.movies like Bend it like Beckham and Shoalin soccer are less concerned with football, concentrating on themes of female empowerment and whatever Shoalin Soccer was about. There are lists of good movies that glorify other sports : Ice hockey has "Mighty Ducks", American football has "Any Given Sunday", and even bobsledding has "Cool Runnings". Hollywood studios make most if not all of the uplifting sport movies, which explains why there are no good football movies. The only one they made was 1981's Escape to victory directed by John Huston which was a poor mashup of "The Longest Yard" and "The Great Escape".

Good sports movies are formulaic movies, so all you need to do is apply the formula to football: a team in desperate need of a win, an unlikely candidate steps up and helps them(Elijah Wood,Romain Duris), they have to face an ultimate opponent, somber and menacing, (Nazis or Russians) and then they somehow overcome their evil rivals.I think it will have to be produced by an independent source because Big studios don't really care but at least the film would be truer to football instead of making it into a romantic comedy or kungfu. It would be more of a rise and fall of a promising,young player, showing the beauty of the game and at the same time exposing its ugly side like "Any Given Sunday", that's what "Goal" tried to achieve. But if a Hollywood studio made a football movie it would be rejected in europe and other places for being formulaic and disingenuous, so the film needs to combine the melodrama of a hollywood sports movie with the realism of an independent film. So here's to "World cup:The movie" being made before the next world cup.